Navigation in oral implantology  – advantages and disadvantages

Marcin Metlerski, Grzegorz Trybek, Magda Aniko-Włodarczyk, Olga Preuss, Katarzyna Grocholewicz

Streszczenie
Celem pracy jest przybliżenie informacji na temat szablonów implantologicznych. Autorzy omawiają zalety oraz wady wynikające z ich zastosowania.

Abstract
The aim of the study is to present a basicinformationabout implant guide. The authors discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using them.

Hasła indeksowe: dokładność, szablon chirurgiczny, szablon implantologiczny, druk 3D, implantologia wspomagana komputerowo

Key words: accurancy, surgical guide, implant guide, 3D printing, computer-assisted design implant dentistry

PIŚMIENNICTWO

1. Chen X. i wsp.: Real-time motion tracking in image-guided oral implantology. Int. J. Med. Robot., 2008, 4, 339-347.
2. Block M.S. i wsp.: Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2017, 32, 92-99.
3. Mischkowski R.A. i wsp.: Comparison of static and dynamic computer-assisted guidance methods in implantology. Int. J. Comput. Dent., 2006, 9, 23-35.
4. Herklotz I. i wsp.: Navigation in implantology. Int J Comput Dent., 2017, 20, 9-19.
5. Kalra M, Aparna I.N., Dhanasekar B.: Evolution of surgical guidance in implant dentistry. Dent. Update, 2013, 40, 577-8, 581-582.6.
6. Ramasamy M. i wsp.: Implant surgical guides: from the past to the present. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci., 2013, 5, 98-102.
7. Turbush S.K., Turkyilmaz I.: Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2012, 108, 181-188.
8. Raico Gallardo Y.N. i wsp.: Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2017, 28, 602-612.
9. Nayar S., Bhuminathan S., Bhat W.M.: Rapid prototyping and stereolithography in dentistry. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci., 2015, 7, 216-219.
10. Osman R.B., Alharbi N., Wismeijer D.: Build angle: does it influence the accuracy of 3D-printed dental restorations using digital light-processing technology? Int. J. Prosthodont., 2017, 30, 2,182-188.
11. Beretta M., Poli P.P., Maiorana C.: Accuracy of computer-aided template-guided oral implant placement: a prospective clinical study. J. Periodontal Implant Sci., 2014 44, 184-193.
12. Nickenig H. i wsp.: Possibilities and limitations of implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates. Int. J. Comput. Dent., 2012, 15, 9-21.
13. Van Assche N. i wsp.: Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res., 2012, 23, 112-23.14. Koop R. i wsp.: Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2013, 24, 630-634.
15. Schneider D. i wsp.: In-vitro evaluation of the tolerance of surgical instruments in templates for computer-assisted guided implantology produced by 3-D printing. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2015, 26, 320-325.
16. Schneider J., Decker R., Kalender W.A.: Accuracy in medicinal modelling. Phidias Nes letters, 2002, 8, 5-14.
17. Matta R.E. i wsp.: The impact of the fabrication method on the three-dimensional accuracy of an implant surgery template. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 2017, 45, 804-808.
18. Dreiseidler T. i wsp.: Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2009, 20, 1191-1199.
19. Worthington P., Rubenstein J. Hatcher D.C.: The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 2010, 141, 19-24.
20. Schneider K. i wsp.: Nowoczesne metody obrazowania radiologicznego w stomatologii. Med. Trib. Stomatol., 2017, 5, 28-34.
21. Atieh M A.:  Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: a clinical study using a reference appliance. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2017, 118, 400-405.
22. Hartkamp O. i wsp.: Optical profilometry versus intraoral (handheld) scanning. Int. J. Comput. Dent., 2017, 20, 165-176.
23. Miechowicz S.: Synteza modelowania złożonych struktur geometrycznych w zastosowaniach medycznych. Wyd. OWPRz, 2012, Rzeszów.
24. Fürhauser R i wsp.: Esthetics of flapless single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla using guided surgery: association of three-dimensional accuracy and pink esthetic score. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17, 427-433.
25. Romero-Ruiz M.M. i wsp.: Flapless implant surgery: a review of the literature and 3 case reports. J. Clin. Exp. Dent., 2015, 7, 146-152.
26. Brignardello-Petersen R.: Minimally invasive flapless approach results in less pain and better healing after implant placement compared with conventional surgery. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 2017, 148, 4, e-24.
27. Arisan V, Karabuda Z., Ozdemir T.: Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J. Periodontol., 2010, 81, 43-51.
28. Park S.J. i wsp.: Reliability of a CAD/CAM surgical guide for implant placement: an in vitro comparison of surgeons' experience levels and implant sites. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2017, 30, 367-169.
29. Rungcharassaeng K. i wsp.: Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator experience. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2015, 114, 407-413.
30. Cushen S.E, Turkyilmaz I.: Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2013, 109, 248-254.
31. Jeong S.M. i wsp.: A 1-year prospective clinical study of soft tissue conditions and marginal bone changes around dental implants after flapless implant surgery. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 2011, 111, 41-46.
32. Becker W. i wsp.: Histologic evaluation of implants following flapless and flapped surgery: a study in canines. J. Periodontol., 2006, 77, 1717-1722.
33. Barter S.: Computer-aided implant placement in the reconstruction of a severely resorbed maxilla – a 5-year clinical study. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 2010, 30, 627-637.
34. Fortin T. i wsp.: Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an image-guided system. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2006, 21, 298-304.
35. Pozzi A. i wsp.: Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicenter  randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol., 2014, 7, 229-242.
36. D’haese J. i wsp.: Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., 2012, 14, 3, 321-335.
37. Liu Y.F. i wsp.: Numerical and experimental analyses on the temperature distribution in the dental implant preparation area when using a surgical guide. J. Prosthodont., 2016, 14.
38. Barrak I.Á., Varga E., Piffko J.: Navigation in implantology: accuracy assessment regarding the literature. Fogorv. Sz., 2016, 109, 61-68.