W pracy opisano aktualne doniesienia dotyczące budowy i funkcji tkanek otaczających wszczepy zębowe i przylegających bezpośrednio do nich oraz odbudowy protetycznej na granicy brzegu kości wyrostka zębodołowego i dziąsła. Przedstawiono czynniki mające wpływ na kształtowanie tkanek miękkich i twardych w trakcie leczenia implantoprotetycznego.

Hasła indeksowe: szerokość biologiczna, implanty, resorpcja kości wyrostka zębodołowego, platform switching

The study describes current reports regarding the structure and function of the tissues surrounding dental implants directly adjacent to them and to prosthetic appliances on the border between the bone edge of the dental alveolus and gum. There is a presentation of the factors having an influence on the shaping of the soft and hard tissues during the course of prosthetic treatment with implants.

Key words: biologic width, dental implants, alveolar bone resorption, platform switching

PIŚMIENNICTWO
1. Gargiulo A.W., Wentz F.M., Orban B.: Mitotic activity of human oral epithelium exposed to 30 per cent hydrogen peroxide. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 196, 14, 474-492.
2. Vacek J.S. i wsp.: The dimensions of the human dentogingival junction. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 1994, 2, 154-165.
3. Hermann J.S. i wsp.: Biologic width around titanium implants. A physiologically formed and stable dimension over time. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2000, 11, 1, 1-11.
4. Listgarten S.A. i wsp.: Periodontal tissues and their counterparts around endosseous implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 1991, 2, 3, 1-19.
5. Myshin H.L., Wiens J.P.: Factors affecting soft tissue around dental implants: a review of the literature. J. Prosteth. Dent., 2005, 94, 5, 440-444.
6. Weber H.P., Cochran D.L.: The soft tissue response to osseointegrated dental implants. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1998, 79, 1, 79-89.
7. Lindhe J., Berglundh T.: The interface between the mucosa and the implant. Periodontol. 2000., 1998, 17, 47-54.
8. Walker L.R.: Dental implant biologic width. Selected Readings in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2006, 14, 27.
9. Telleman G. i wsp.: Impact of platform switching on inter-proximal bone levels around short implants in the posterior region; 1-year results from a randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2012, 39, 7, 688-697.
10. Linkevicius T., Apse P.: Biologic width around implants. An evidence-based review. Stomatologija,  2008, 10, 27-35.
11. Glauser R. i wsp.: Periimplant soft tissue barier at experimental one-piece mini-implants with different surfaces topography in humans: a light-microscopic overview and histometric analysis. Clin. Implants Dent. Relat. Res., 2005, 7, 1, 44-51.
12. Rompen E. i wsp.: The effect of material characteristics, of surface topography and of implant components and connections on soft tissue integration: a literature review. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2006;17, 2, 55-67.
13. Souza O.M.R. i wsp.: Influence of tissue biotype in the morpho-esthetic-functional behavior of the peri-implant tissue: A literature review. Dent. Press Implantol. ,2012, 6, 2, 56-66.
14. Szyszkowski A., Marcin Kozakiewicz M.: Ocena wybranych czynników rokowniczych w leczeniu implantologicznym jamy ustnej. Mag. Stomatol., 2013, XXIII, 7-8, 12-16.
15. Nisapakultorn K. i wsp.: Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single tooth implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2010, 21, 6, 662-670.
16. Chow Y.C., Wang H.L.: Factors and techniques influencing periimplant papillae. Implant Dent., 2010, 19, 3, 208-219.
17. Kao R.T., Pasquinelli K.: Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 2002, 30, 7, 521-526.
18. Raes F. i wsp.: Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1-year results of a case aeries on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2011, 38, 4, 385-394.
19. Gastaldo J.F., Cury R.P., Sendyk W.R.: Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla. J. Periodontol., 2004, 75, 9, 1242-1246.
20. de Oliviera R.R. i wsp.: Influence of interimplant distance on papilla formation and bone resorption: A clinical-radiographic study in dogs. J. Oral Implantol., 2006, 32, 5, 218-227.
21. Mankoo T.: Contemporary implant concepts in aesthetic dentistry. Part 1: Biologic width. Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent., 2003, 15, 8, 609-616.
22. Tarnow D.P., Cho S.C., Wallace S.S.: The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of the inter-implant bone crest. J. Periodontol.,  2000, 71, 4, 546-549.
23. Bengazi F., Wennstrom J.L., Lekholm U.: Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 1996, 4, 303-310.
24. Lin G.H., Chan H.L., Wang H.L.: The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J. Periodontol. , 2013, 84, 12, 1755-1767.
25. Linkevicius T. i wsp.: The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants., 2009, 24, 712-719.
26. Capelli M.: Surgical, biologic and implant-related factors affecting bone remodeling around implants. Eur. J. Esthet. Dent., 2013, 8, 2, 279-313.
27. Grunder U.: Stability of the mucosal topography around single-tooth implants and adjacent teeth: 1-year results. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.,  2000, 20, 1, 11-7.
28. Albrektsson T.: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria for success. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1986, 1, 1, 11-25.
29. Smith D.E., Zarb G.A.: Criteria for success of osteointegrated endosseous implants. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1989, 62, 5, 567-572.
30. Hänggi M.P. i wsp.: Crestal bone changes around titanium implants Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machines collar lengths. J. Periodontol., 2005, 76, 5,  791-802.
31. Atieh M.A., Ibrahim H.A., Atieh A.H.: Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Periodontol.,  2010, 81, 10, 1350-1366.
32. Kuhller N., Sharma N.: Biologic width: evaluation and correction of its violation. J. Oral Health Comm Dent., 2009, 3, 1, 20-25.
33. Wilderman M.N., Wentz F.M., Orban B.J.: Histogenesis of repair after osseous surgery. J. Periodontol.,  1970, 41, 551-565.
34. Eriksson R.A., Albrektsson T.: The effect of heat on bone regeneration. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 1984, 42, 701-711.
35. Alvarenga E.C. i wsp.: Low intensity pulsed ultrasound-dependent osteoblast proliferation occurs by via activation of the P2Y reseptor: role of the P2Y1 receptor. Bone, 2009, 46, 2, 355-362.
36. Ramli R. i wsp.: The effect of ultrasound on angiogenesis an in vitro study using the chick chorioallantoic membrane. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2009, 24, 4, 591-596.
37. Vercellotti T. i wsp.: Osseous response following resective theraphy with piezosurgery. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.,  2005, 25, 543-549.
38. Quirynen M., Steenberghe D.: Bacterial colonization of the internal part of two-stage implants. An in vivo study. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 1993, 4, 3, 158-161.
39. King G. i wsp.: Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible. J. Periodontol. , 2002, 73, 10, 1111-1117.
40. Hermann J.S. i wsp.: Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J. Periodontol.,  2000, 71, 9, 1412-1424.
41. Hansson S.: Implant-abutment interface Biomechanical study of flap top versus conical. Clin. Implant Dent. Rel. Res., 2000, 2, 1, 33-41.
42. Ghert M. i wsp.: Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service. Clin. Oral Investig.,  2012, 17, 1, 275-284.
43. Touati B.: Preparation of excessive reduction. Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent., 2004, 16, 7, 474.
44. Fabbri G.: Anterior discoloured teeth restored with procera all-ceramic restorations: a clinical evaluation of the esthetic outcome based on the thickness of the core selected. Eur. J. Esthet. Dent., 2011, 6, 76-86.
45. Small P.N., Tarnow D.P,  Cho S.C.: Gingival recession around wide-diameter versus standard-diameter implants: a 3- to 5-year longitudinal prospective study. Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent., 2001, 13, 2, 143-146.
46. Canullo L. i wsp.: Soft tissue around long-term platform switching implant restorations: a histological human evaluation. Preliminary results. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2011, 38, 86-94.
47. Nevis M. i wsp.: Human histologic assessment of a platform-switched osseointegrated dental implant. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 2014, 34, 3, 71-73.
48. De Angelis N. i wsp.: Platform switching versus conventional technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 2014, 3, 3, 75-79.
49. Makigusa  K. i wsp.: Effects of platform switching on crestal bone around implants: a histomorphometric study in monkeys. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 2014, 34, 3, 35-41.
50. Rodriguez-Ciurana X. i wsp.: The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform-switched implants. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 2009, 29, 141-151.
51. Ericcson I. i wsp.: Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues. J. Clin. Periodontol., 1995, 22, 255-261.
52. Abrahamsson I., Berglundh T., Lindhe J.: The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection.  An experimental study in dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol., 1997, 24, 8, 568-572.
53. Abrahamsson I., Berglundh T., Lindhe J.: The mucosal barier following abutment dis-reconection. An experimental study in dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol., 1997, 8, 568.
54. Rompen E. i wsp.: The effect of material characteristics, of surface topography and of implant components and connections on soft tissue integration: a literature review. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2006,  2, 55-67.