Dostęp do tego artykułu jest płatny.
Zapraszamy do zakupu!
Cena: 12.50 PLN (z VAT)
Kup artykuł
Po dokonaniu zakupu artykuł w postaci pliku PDF prześlemy bezpośrednio pod twój adres e-mail.
Streszczenie
Artykuł omawia złożoną problematykę nowoczesnej stomatologii adhezyjnej w estetycznej rekonstrukcji uszkodzonych zębów. Na podstawie piśmiennictwa i doświadczeń własnych autor przedstawia argumenty oraz wskazania przemawiające za stosowaniem zachowawczych metod minimalnie inwazyjnej stomatologii rekonstrukcyjnej.
Abstract
The article discusses the complex problem of modern dental dentistry in the reconstruction of damaged teeth. Based on the literature and his own experience, the author presents arguments and indications for the application of conservative methods of minimally invasive reconstructive dentistry.
Hasła indeksowe: leczenie pośrednie, licówki ceramiczne, ceramika skaleniowa
Key words: indirect treatment, ceramic veneers, scalene ceramic
PIŚMIENNICTWO
1. Buonocore M.G.: A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J. Dent. Res., 1955, 34, 849-853.
2. Brentel A.S. i wsp.: Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldspathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent. Mater., 2007, 23, 1323-1331.
3. Valandro L.F. i wsp.: The effect of ceramic surface treatment on bonding to densely sintered alumina ceramic. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2005, 93, 253-259.
4. Edelhoff D., Sorenson J.A.: Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2002, 87, 503-509.
5. Edelhoff D., Sorenson J.A.: Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 2002, 22, 241-249.
6. Al-Fouzan A.F., Tashkandi E.A.: Volumetric measurements of removed tooth structure associated with various preparation designs. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2013, 26, 545-548.
7. Peumans M. i wsp.: Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J. Dent., 2000, 28, 163-177.
8. Magne P., Douglas W.H.: Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization andbiomimetic recovery of the crown. Int. J. Prosthodont., 1999, 12, 111-121.
9. Magne P., Douglas W.H.: Interdental design of porcelain veneers in the presence of composite fillings: finite element analysis of composite shrinkage and thermal stresses. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2000, 13, 117-124.
10. Burke F.J.: Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., 2012, 24, 257-265.
11. Gurel G. i wsp.: Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 2013, 33, 31-39.
12. Magne P., Douglas W.H.: Interdental design of porcelain veneers in the presence of composite fillings: finite element analysis of composite shrinkage and thermal stresses. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2000, 13, 117-124.
13. Rieder C.E.: The use of provisional restorations to develop and achieve esthetic expectations. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 1989, 9, 122-139.
14. Magne P., Douglas W.H.: Design optimization and evolution of bonded ceramics for the anterior dentition: a finite-element analysis. Quintessence Int., 1999, 30, 661-672.
15. Rouse J.S.: Full veneer versus traditional veneer preparation: A discussion of interproximal extension. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1997, 78, 545-549.
16. Magne P., Belser U.: Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition. Quintessence, Chicago, 2002, 140-142.
17. Schmidt K.K. i wsp.: Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2011, 105, 374-382.
18. Gresnigt M.M., Kalk W., Ozcan M.: Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite & ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J. Adhes. Dent., 2013, 15, 181-190.
19. Beier U.S. i wsp.: Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2012, 25, 79-85.
20. Magne P., Belser U.: Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition. A Biomimetic Approach. Quintessence Publ., 2002.
21. Mann S.: The biomimetics of enamel: A paradigm for organized biomaterial synthesis. Ciba Found. Symp., 1997, 205, 261-269.
22. Layton D.M., Walton T.R.: The up to the 21-year clinical outcome and survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers: accouting for clustering. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2012, 25, 604-612.
Artykuł omawia złożoną problematykę nowoczesnej stomatologii adhezyjnej w estetycznej rekonstrukcji uszkodzonych zębów. Na podstawie piśmiennictwa i doświadczeń własnych autor przedstawia argumenty oraz wskazania przemawiające za stosowaniem zachowawczych metod minimalnie inwazyjnej stomatologii rekonstrukcyjnej.
Abstract
The article discusses the complex problem of modern dental dentistry in the reconstruction of damaged teeth. Based on the literature and his own experience, the author presents arguments and indications for the application of conservative methods of minimally invasive reconstructive dentistry.
Hasła indeksowe: leczenie pośrednie, licówki ceramiczne, ceramika skaleniowa
Key words: indirect treatment, ceramic veneers, scalene ceramic
PIŚMIENNICTWO
1. Buonocore M.G.: A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J. Dent. Res., 1955, 34, 849-853.
2. Brentel A.S. i wsp.: Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldspathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent. Mater., 2007, 23, 1323-1331.
3. Valandro L.F. i wsp.: The effect of ceramic surface treatment on bonding to densely sintered alumina ceramic. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2005, 93, 253-259.
4. Edelhoff D., Sorenson J.A.: Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2002, 87, 503-509.
5. Edelhoff D., Sorenson J.A.: Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 2002, 22, 241-249.
6. Al-Fouzan A.F., Tashkandi E.A.: Volumetric measurements of removed tooth structure associated with various preparation designs. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2013, 26, 545-548.
7. Peumans M. i wsp.: Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J. Dent., 2000, 28, 163-177.
8. Magne P., Douglas W.H.: Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization andbiomimetic recovery of the crown. Int. J. Prosthodont., 1999, 12, 111-121.
9. Magne P., Douglas W.H.: Interdental design of porcelain veneers in the presence of composite fillings: finite element analysis of composite shrinkage and thermal stresses. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2000, 13, 117-124.
10. Burke F.J.: Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., 2012, 24, 257-265.
11. Gurel G. i wsp.: Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 2013, 33, 31-39.
12. Magne P., Douglas W.H.: Interdental design of porcelain veneers in the presence of composite fillings: finite element analysis of composite shrinkage and thermal stresses. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2000, 13, 117-124.
13. Rieder C.E.: The use of provisional restorations to develop and achieve esthetic expectations. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 1989, 9, 122-139.
14. Magne P., Douglas W.H.: Design optimization and evolution of bonded ceramics for the anterior dentition: a finite-element analysis. Quintessence Int., 1999, 30, 661-672.
15. Rouse J.S.: Full veneer versus traditional veneer preparation: A discussion of interproximal extension. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1997, 78, 545-549.
16. Magne P., Belser U.: Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition. Quintessence, Chicago, 2002, 140-142.
17. Schmidt K.K. i wsp.: Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2011, 105, 374-382.
18. Gresnigt M.M., Kalk W., Ozcan M.: Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite & ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J. Adhes. Dent., 2013, 15, 181-190.
19. Beier U.S. i wsp.: Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2012, 25, 79-85.
20. Magne P., Belser U.: Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition. A Biomimetic Approach. Quintessence Publ., 2002.
21. Mann S.: The biomimetics of enamel: A paradigm for organized biomaterial synthesis. Ciba Found. Symp., 1997, 205, 261-269.
22. Layton D.M., Walton T.R.: The up to the 21-year clinical outcome and survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers: accouting for clustering. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2012, 25, 604-612.
