PIŚMIENNICTWO

1. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS i wsp. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2011; 37(7): 895-902.
2. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non-surgical root canal treatment. Part 1. Periapical health. Int Endod J. 2011; 44(7): 583-609.
3. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non-surgical root canal treatment. Part 2. Tooth survival. Int Endod J. 2011; 44(7): 610-625.
4. Gomes AC, Nejaim Y, Silva AI i wsp. Influence of endodontic treatment and coronal restoration on status of periapical tissues. A cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2015; 41(10): 1614-1618.
5. Azim AA, Griggs JA, Huang GT. The Tennessee study. Factors affecting treatment outcome and healing time following nonsurgical root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2016; 49(1): 6-16.
6. Fransson H, Dawson VS, Frisk F i wsp. Survival of root-filled teeth in the Swedish adult population. J Endod. 2016; 42(2): 216-220.
7. Gomes AC, Nejaim Y, Silva AI i wsp. Influence of endodontic treatment and coronal restoration on status of periapical tissues. A cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2015; 41(10): 1614-1618.
8. Willershausen B, Tekyatan H, Krummenauer F i wsp. Survival rate of endodontically treated teeth in relation to conservative vs post insertion techniques – a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res. 2005; 10(5): 204-208.
9. Torabinejad M, Anderson P, Bader J i wsp. Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replacement. A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98(4): 285-311.
10. Iqbal MK, Kim S. For teeth requiring endodontic treatment, what are the differences in out-comes of restored endodontically treated teeth compared to implant-supported restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22(Suppl): 96-116.
11. Madison S, Zakariasen KL. Linear and volumetric analysis of apical leakage in teeth prepared for posts. J Endod. 1984; 10(9): 422-427.
12. Bourgeois RS, Lemon RR. Dowel space preparation and apical leakage. J Endod. 1981; 7(2): 66-69.
13. de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR i wsp. Treatment outcome in endodontics. The Toronto study – phases 3 and 4. Orthograde retreatment. J Endod. 2008; 34(2): 131-137.
14. Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994; 10(2): 91-93.
15. Adolphi G, Zehnder M, Bachmann LM i wsp. Direct resin composite restorations in vital versus root-filled posterior teeth. A controlled comparative long-term follow-up. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(5): 437-442.
16. Uzunoglu E, Aktemur S, Uyanik MO i wsp. Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on root fracture with respect to concentration at different time exposures. J Endod. 2012; 38(8): 1110-1113.
17. Bakland LK, Andreasen JO. Will mineral trioxide aggregate replace calcium hydroxide in treating pulpal and periodontal healing complications subsequent to dental trauma? A review. Dent Traumatol. 2012; 28(1): 25-32.
18. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C i wsp. Ferrule effect. A literature review. J Endod. 2012; 38(1): 11-19.
19. Zhang YY, Peng MD, Wang YN i wsp. The effects of ferrule configuration on the anti-fracture ability of fiber post-restored teeth. J Dent. 2015; 43(1): 117-125.
20. Shemesh H, Bier CA, Wu MK i wsp. The effects of canal preparation and filling on the incidence of dentinal defects. Int Endod J. 2009; 42(3): 208-213.
21. Randow K, Glantz PO. On cantilever loading of vital and non-vital teeth. An experimental clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1986; 44(5): 271-277.
22. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989; 15(11): 512-516.
23. Dejak B. Wpływ „ferrule effect” na wytrzymałość zębów przednich odbudowanych wkładami koronowo-korzeniowymi kompozytowymi wzmacnianymi włóknami szklanymi. Protet Stomatol. 2012; 62(4): 264-274.
24. Milot P, Stein RS. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68(3): 428-435.
25. Stempniewicz A, Biały M, Więckiewicz W. Błędy kliniczne w wykonawstwie wkładów koronowo-korzeniowych. Opis przypadków. Mag Stomatol. 2013; 23(6): 18-21.
26. Biały M, Dąbrowa T, Więckiewicz W. Analiza porównawcza indywidualnych wkładów koronowo-korzeniowych lanych oraz standardowych kompozytowych wzmacnianych włóknem szklanym – przegląd piśmiennictwa. Dent Forum. 2013; 41(1): 53-56.
27. Grossmann Y, Sadan A. The prosthodontic concept of crown-to-root ratio. A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93(6): 559-562.
28. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I i wsp. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. A systematic review of the literature. Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int. 2008; 39(2): 117-129.
29. Hidaka O, Iwasaki M, Saito M i wsp. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure. J Dent Res. 1999; 78(7): 1336-1344.
30. Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J i wsp. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. J Dent. 2017; 59: 54-61.
31. Wang CH, Du JK, Li HY i wsp. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a post used to restore a root filled premolar using the finite element stress analysis combined with the Taguchi method. Int Endod J. 2016; 49(7): 690-699.
32. Du JK, Lin WK, Wang CH i wsp. FEM analysis of the mandibular first premolar with different post diameters. 2011; 99(2): 148-154.
33. Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Roig M i wsp. Composite vs ceramic computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing crowns in endodontically treated teeth. Analysis of marginal adaptation. Oper Dent. 2013; 38(6): 663-673.
34. Magne P, Douglas WH. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure. Intact versus veneered incisors. Quintessence Int. 2000; 31(1): 5-18.
35. Scotti N, Rota R, Scansetti M i wsp. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110(5): 376-382.
36. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1985; 1(3): 108-111.
37. Morgano SM, Hashem AF, Fotoohi K i wsp. A nationwide survey of contemporary philosophies and techniques of restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72(3): 259-267.
38. Eckerbom M, Magnusson T. Restoring endodontically treated teeth. A survey of current opinions among board-certified prosthodontists and general dental practitioners in Sweden. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14(3): 245-249.
39. Fransson H, Dawson VS, Frisk F i wsp. Survival of root-filled teeth in the Swedish adult population. J Endod. 2016; 42(2): 216-220.
40. von Stein‐Lausnitz M, Mehnert A, Bruhnke M i wsp. Direct or indirect restoration of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors with class III defects? Composite vs veneer or crown restoration. J Adhes Dent. 2018; 20(6): 519‐
41. Shu X, Mai QQ, Blatz M i wsp. Direct and indirect restorations for endodontically treated teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis, IAAD 2017 Consensus Conference Paper. J Adhes Dent. 2018; 20(3): 183-194.
42. Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM i wsp. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth. An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. J Dent. 2017; 63: 1-7.
43. Hayes A, Duvall N, Wajdowicz M i wsp. Effect of endocrown pulp chamber extension depth on molar fracture resistance. Oper Dent. 2017; 42(3): 327-334.
44. Magne P, Lazari PC, Carvalho MA i wsp. Ferrule-effect dominates over use of a fiber post when restoring endodontically treated incisors. An in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2017; 42(4): 396-406.
45. Konarska-Matysiak D, Dejak B. Porównanie właściwości zębów bocznych odbudowanych standardowymi kompozytowymi wkładami koronowo-korzeniowymi wzmacnianymi włóknami szklanymi i endokoronami – przegląd piśmiennictwa. Protet Stomatol. 2013; 63(3): 201-207.
46. Meyenberg K. The ideal restoration of endodontically treated teeth – structural and esthetic considerations. A review of the literature and clinical guidelines for the restorative clinician. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013; 8(2): 238-268.
47. Guldener KA, Lanzrein CL, Siegrist Guldener BE i wsp. Long-term clinical outcomes of endodontically treated teeth restored with or without fiber post-retained single-unit restorations. J Endod. 2017; 43(2): 188-193.
48. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM i wsp. A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res. 2012; 91(7 Suppl): 72S-78S.
49. Sorrentino R, Salameh Z, Zarone F i wsp. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9(1): 49-56.
50. D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M i wsp. In vitro fracture resistance and deflection of pulpless teeth restored with fiber posts and prepared for veneers. J Endod. 2008; 34(7): 838-841.
51. Paolone G, Saracinelli M, Devoto W i wsp. Esthetic direct restorations in endodontically treated anterior teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013; 8(1): 44-67.
52. Sarkis-Onofre R, Pereira-Cenci T, Opdam NJ i wsp. Preference for using posts to restore endodontically treated teeth. Findings from a survey with dentists. Braz Oral Res. 2015; 29: 1-6.
53. Naumann M, Neuhaus KW, Kölpin M i wsp. Why, when, and how general practitioners restore endodontically treated teeth. A representative survey in Germany. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20(2): 253-259.
54. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138:775-83.
55. Chang JW, Soo I, Cheung GS. Evaluation of fiber post-supported restorations under simulated occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 108(3): 158-164.
56. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Käyser AF. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent. 1993; 21(5): 281-284.
57. Kainose K, Nakajima M, Foxton R i wsp. Stress distribution in root filled teeth restored with various post and core techniques. Effect of post length and crown height. Int Endod J. 2015; 48(11): 1023-1032.
58. Pilo R, Cardash HS, Levin E i wsp. Effect of core stiffness on the in vitro fracture of crowned, endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88(3): 302-306.
59. Franco EB, Lins do Valle A, Pompéia Fraga de Almeida AL i wsp. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts of different lengths. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111(1): 30-34.
60. Abdulrazzak SS, Sulaiman E, Atiya BK i wsp. Effect of ferrule height and glass fibre post length on fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated teeth. Aust Endod J. 2014; 40(2): 81-86.